I read the following from Donald Trump's blog:
The End of the MBA is Nigh!
Creativity, design and innovation are today's real success tools
by Tom Peters
I am fundamentally, at some level, offended by the notion of "Master of Administration." I guess I shouldn't be offended. It was probably a damn good idea 40 or 50 years ago. I remember reading the story of the "Whiz Kids," who helped win World War II, and then turned around Ford. Robert S. McNamara, Ford President, then Defense Secretary, was the Whiz-iest of the kids. What he discovered was that the U.S. Army Air Force didn't know how many planes they had. And so he counted the planes. And it helped. A lot. And then he went to Ford. And he pretty much found out that they didn't have any idea how many cars they'd made. And so he counted up the cars. AND THINGS GOT BETTER. So there was a time when doing those "basics" . . . countin' the planes, countin' the cars . . . made . . . no doubt . . . ALL THE DIFFERENCE.
But after 60 or 70 years of the MBA . . . we count the cars and the planes pretty damn well. And besides, the microprocessor is counting them a lot faster than the graduates of Harvard & Stanford & Wharton. The stuff that used to be "special" has become routine. And the stuff that's necessary (as I see it) . . . The Big Three . . . creativity - design - innovation . . . have been blithely ignored by the business schools!
Clayton Christensen, a Harvard Business School professor (I guess they get two things right - Enriquez and Christensen), wrote a well-received book called The Innovator's Dilemma. He chided business for its conservatism. (He might as well have chided Harvard!) "Good management," he began, "was the most powerful reason [leading firms] failed to stay atop their industries. Precisely because these firms listened to their [biggest & most conservative] customers, invested aggressively in technologies that would provide their customers more and better products of the sort they wanted, and because they carefully studied market trends and systematically allocated investment capital to innovations that promised the best returns, they lost their positions of leadership."
That's a helluva condemnation! And I buy it.
Blog editor's note: Tom Peters, called "business's best friend and worst nightmare" by BusinessWeek, is one of the preememinent business gurus of our time. Used with permission. For more information, visit www.tompeters.com.
If the above is true, then smart corporations will slowly move out of its "good management" mode, into the creativity and innovation mode. What does this say about what to wear at corporations?
Here's my prediction:
1. Don't think that suits will be out. I believe that suits will be in always, in the long run. Suits give the message of professionalism and trust. For example, I will not go to a banker who wears jeans and t-shirt at the branch. But I can accept bankers to wear more splashes of colors and styles than what they wear now. An example: a mat silver colored suit with black shirt and a black tie dotted sparingly with diamonds. Hence, the color coordination and the styles will be more creative. Think: red, pink, yellow, green, purple...which link to
2. Bright colored shirts will be in - inspired by creativity and innovation. Who wants to wear white all the time in a less conservative environment?
3. Stylish suits - think creative Versace rather than conservative Armani.
4. Wilder hairstyles - sleek, chic hair is always in. However, most corporate people don't know how to make use of that. Instead, they stay with conservative, *blah* styles that are outdated. I know someone who hasn't changed his 50's style hair for 20 years, and this person is only in his 30's! Perhaps with the move to creativity and innovation, hair will become slightly wild - longer hair for men, perhaps. I believe either stylishly wild or stylishly chic. But conservative and boring will no longer be acceptable.
5. Fun shoes - rather than black pumps for women and dark oxfords for men, perhaps the era of innovation will spark an interest in more comfortable yet stylish shoes. Think sporty comfy Lacoste, not conservative Ecco.
The main message of innovation, in terms of image management, is creativity with styles and colors, rather than giving up professionalism.
I wonder when this wonderful time will arrive?
